Preserved Gait Symmetry Despite Attenuated Upper-Body Motion: A Within-Subject Observational Study
R. Yousefian Molla

, H. Sadeghi

, A. Rahnama

Abstract: Objective: Gait symmetry is a key indicator of neuromuscular integrity and movement quality. While the role of the lower limbs in maintaining symmetrical walking is well established, the contribution of the upper body—particularly natural arm swing—remains less understood, especially in trained female athletes. This study investigated whether restricting upper-limb motion affects spatiotemporal gait symmetry in professional female bodybuilders. Materials and methods: Thirty female athletes (20–34 years) completed two randomized walking conditions: normal arm swing and restricted arm swing, with upper limbs secured across the chest. Three-dimensional gait kinematics were recorded using a Vicon motion capture system. Spatiotemporal parameters and multiple symmetry indices—including Symmetry Ratio (SR), Symmetry Index (SI_avg, SI_left, SI_right), Symmetry Angle (SA), and Gait Asymmetry (GA)—were computed from bilateral temporal parameters. Paired t-tests with Bonferroni correction assessed differences between conditions. Results: Across all gait parameters—step length, step duration, stance phase, single support, and double support—no significant differences were detected between normal and restricted arm-swing conditions (all p > 0.05). Symmetry indices remained stable and close to ideal symmetrical values. These results indicate that participants effectively preserved both spatial and temporal gait symmetry despite reduced upper-body mobility. Discussion: Trained female athletes maintain robust gait symmetry even under acute upper-limb motion restriction, likely due to efficient multi-segmental compensatory mechanisms involving trunk and lower-limb coordination. Conclusion: These findings highlight the neuromuscular system's adaptability in highly trained individuals and support rehabilitation or training protocols that involve temporary upper-limb constraints.
Series on Biomechanics, Vol.40, No. 2 (2026),85-93
DOI: 10.7546/SB.40.02.08.2026
Keywords: arm movement; athletes; biomechanical phenomena; Gait; gait symmetry
| References: (click to open/close) | [1] Song A. Neuromuscular Control Strategy During Object Transport While Walking: Adaptive Integration of Upper and Lower Limb Movements: Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College; 2021. [2] Sarkodie-Gyan T, Yu H. The human locomotor system: physiological and technological foundations. The Human Locomotor System: Physiological and Technological Foundations: Springer; 2023. 1-76. [3] Izzo R, Bertoni M, Cejudo A, Giovannelli M, Varde'i CH. The global symmetry index, symmetry index, quality index and kinematics of the gait cycle with the synchronized contribution of the latest generation magneticinertial and electromyographic technology. Practical surveys and planning hypotheses for the revision of gesture. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2022;22, 5,1258-70. [4] Viteckova S, Kutilek P, Svoboda Z, Krupicka R, Kauler J, Szabo Z. Gait symmetry measures: A review of current and prospective methods. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. 2018, 42, 89-100. [5] Tan CK, Kadone H, Watanabe H, Marushima A, Yamazaki M, Sankai Y, et al. Lateral symmetry of synergies in lower limb muscles of acute post-stroke patients after robotic intervention. Frontiers in neuroscience. 2018;12, 276. [6] Bisson N. The Effect of Arm Swing and Asymmetric Walking on Gait Kinetics in Young Adults: Université d'Ottawa/University of Ottawa; 2023. [7] Koo Y-J, Ogihara N, Koo S. Active Arm Swing During Running Improves Rotational Stability of the Upper Body and Metabolic Energy Efficiency. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2025;53, 4, 1003-13. [8] Punt M, Bruijn SM, Wittink H, van Dieën JH. Effect of arm swing strategy on local dynamic stability of human gait. Gait & posture. 2015;4,12, 504-9. [9] Umberger BR. Effects of suppressing arm swing on kinematics, kinetics, and energetics of human walking. Journal of biomechanics. 2008; 4,111, 2575-80. [10] Matuszewska A, Syczewska M. Analysis of the movements of the upper extremities during gait: Their role for the dynamic balance. Gait & Posture. 2023;100, 82-90. [11] Karoulla E, Matsangidou M, Frangoudes F, Paspalides P, Neokleous K, Pattichis CS. Tracking upper limb motion via wearable solutions: systematic review of research from 2011 to 2023. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2024;26:e51994. [12] Hill A, Nantel J. The effects of arm swing amplitude and lower-limb asymmetry on gait stability. PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0218644. [13] Bailey CA, Hill A, Graham RB, Nantel J. Effects of arm swing amplitude and lower limb asymmetry on motor variability patterns during treadmill gait. Journal of biomechanics. 2022;130, 110855. [14] Ustinova KI, Langenderfer JE, Balendra N. Enhanced arm swing alters interlimb coordination during overground walking in individuals with traumatic brain injury. Human movement science. 2017;52, 45-54. [15] O’Mahoney C, Woods S, McKiel A, Falk B. A question of rate? Girl-women differences in motor unit firing rate. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2025:1-15. [16] Hewett TE, Ford KR, Xu YY, Khoury J, Myer GD. Effectiveness of neuromuscular training based on the neuromuscular risk profile. The American journal of sports medicine. 2017;45, 9, 2142-7. [17] Taylor CA, Kopicko BH, Negro F, Thompson CK. Sex differences in the detection of motor unit action potentials identified using high-density surface electromyography. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2022;65, 102675. [18] Nadeau S, Gravel D, Olney SJ. Determinants, limiting factors, and compensatory strategies in gait. Critical Reviews™ in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 200, 113, 1. [19] Espinosa OFR, Eraso NEM, Castro YPC, Guzmán VJ. Biomechanical and Physiological Comparison Between a Conventional Cyclist and a Paralympic Cyclist with an Optimized Transtibial Prosthesis Design. Prosthesis. 2025;7(5):106. [20] Hardaker NJ, Hume PA, Sims ST. Differences in injury profiles between female and male athletes across the participant classification framework: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports medicine. 2024;54, 6,1595-665. [21] Murthy S, Marchello CS, Hagedoorn NN, Faigan S, Andrews JR, Antillón M, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies Enhanced Prevalence and Incidence Criteria (STROBE EPIC): an extension of the STROBE statement. VeriXiv. 2025;2, 51. [22] Thibault RT, Zavalis EA, Malički M, Pedder H. An evaluation of reproducibility and errors in published sample size calculations performed using G* Power. medRxiv. 2024:2024.07. 15.24310458. [23] Asafa MA, Bolarinwa RA, Oyewade AS, Ahmed IO, Ogunlade O. Assessment of Cormic Index and other Anthropometric Parameters of young adults with Sickle Cell Anaemia in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. American Journal of Internal Medicine. 2022;10, 5, 108-13. [24] Goldfarb N, Lewis A, Tacescu A, Fischer GS. Open source Vicon Toolkit for motion capture and Gait Analysis. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2021;212, 106414. [25] Ader LGM, Greene BR, McManus K, Caulfield B. Reliability of inertial sensor based spatiotemporal gait parameters for short walking bouts in community dwelling older adults. Gait & posture. 2021;85,1-6. [26] Shylaja G, Venkatesh B, Naidu VK, Murali K. Improved finite element triangular meshing for symmetric geometries using MATLAB. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021;46, 4375-80. [27] Bruijn SM, Meijer OG, Beek PJ, Van Dieen JH. The effects of arm swing on human gait stability. Journal of experimental biology. 2010;213, 23, 3945-52. [28] Siragy T, Mezher C, Hill A, Nantel J. Active arm swing and asymmetric walking leads to increased variability in trunk kinematics in young adults. Journal of biomechanics. 2020;99,109529. [29] Mirelman A, Bernad-Elazari H, Nobel T, Thaler A, Peruzzi A, Plotnik M, et al. Effects of aging on arm swing during gait: the role of gait speed and dual tasking. PloS one. 2015;10(8):e0136043. [30] Bondi M, Zeilig G, Bloch A, Fasano A, Plotnik M. Split-arm swinging: the effect of arm swinging manipulation on interlimb coordination during walking. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2017;118, 2, 1021-33. [31] Klarner T. A dissertation on nervous system control and interlimb coordination during rhythmic movement and on locomotor recovery after stroke 2016. [32] Plant GW, Weinrich JA, Kaltschmidt JA. Sensory and descending motor circuitry during development and injury. Current opinion in neurobiology. 2018;53, 156-61. [33] Delafontaine A, Vialleron T, Hussein T, Yiou E, Honeine J-L, Colnaghi S. Anticipatory postural adjustments during gait initiation in stroke patients. Frontiers in neurology. 2019;10, 352. [34] Chang M, Slater LV, Corbett RO, Hart JM, Hertel J. Muscle activation patterns of the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex during walking gait before and after exercise. Gait & posture. 2017;52,15-21. [35] Perry J, Burnfield JM. Trunk and pelvis gait deviations. Gait Analysis: CRC Press; 2024. 259-77. [36] Thomas JS, Corcos DM, Hasan Z. Kinematic and kinetic constraints on arm, trunk, and leg segments in target-reaching movements. Journal of neurophysiology. 2005. [37] Amini S, Kardan I, Seth A, Akbarzadeh A. Empowering human-like walking with a bio-inspired gait controller for an under-actuated torque-driven human model. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics. 2025;20, 2, 026026. [38] Dantchev D, Nikolov S, Nikolova GS. Mathematical Model of Human Walking: A Theoretical Study Based on Anthropometric Data. Biomechanics. 2026;6, 2, 42. [39] Nikolova G, Dantchev D. Age changes in the basic antropometric characteristics of the average Bulgarian females. Series on Biomechanics 37,1,5-12, 2023.
|
|
| Date published: 2026-07-17
(Price of one pdf file: 25.00 EUR)