Design and FEA Analysis of Hip Implants with Stress-Relieving Features for Improved Biomechanical Performance
R. Pavankumar
, G. Mallesh
Abstract: Hip joint replacement surgery is common for patients with severe hip joint damage, and hip implant design critically affects biomechanical performance. This study examines how stress-relieving features (SRFs) affect hip implant’s biomechanical performance under different human actions. Objective: This study examines the biomechanical performance of hip implants under various human actions and proposes design features to reduce stress concentrations, improve reliability, and reduce implant volume. Methodology: Three geometries are modelled with the base model without SRFs, while Models I, II, and III had circular, diamond, and diamond indent SRFs. FEA static analysis is simulated using ANSYS 19.2 for walking, jogging, jumping, and descending stairs. Results: Compared to the baseline model, model with SRFs reduce stresses by 15-16%. Model III (Diamond Indent SRFs) performs best with minimal deformation and stress. Model I (Circular SRFs) reduces stresses but increases deformations, while Model II (Diamond SRFs) balances stress relief and structural stability. Discussion: Stress-relieving features (SRFs) improves hip implant’s mechanical performance under dynamic conditions. Conclusion: SRFs improve biomechanical performance and reduce material failure. The optimised SRF models can help manage deformations and stresses, and Model III (Diamond Indent SRFs) is best for applications that need high performance with low deflections and stresses.
Series on Biomechanics, Vol.38, No.3 (2024), 15-23
DOI:10.7546/SB.02.03.2024
Keywords: ANSYS; biomechanics; finite element analysis; Hip implant; human actions; static analysis; stress-relieving features
References: (click to open/close) | [1] Merola, M. and Affatato, S., 2019. Materials for hip prostheses: a review of wear and loading considerations. Materials, 12, 3, 495. [2] Gok, M.G., 2022. Creation and finite-element analysis of multi-lattice structure design in hip stem implant to reduce the stress-shielding effect. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications, 236, 2, 429-439. [3] Hebbal, M.S., Math, V.B. and Sheeparamatti, B.G., 2009. A study on reducing the root fillet stress in spur gear using internal stress relieving feature of different shapes. International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering, 1, 5, 163-165. [4] Zhang, L.C., Chen, L.Y. and Wang, L., 2020. Surface modification of titanium and titanium alloys: technologies, developments, and future interests. Advanced Engineering Materials, 22, 5, 1901258. [5] Mantripragada, V.P., Lecka‐Czernik, B., Ebraheim, N.A. and Jayasuriya, A.C., 2013. An overview of recent advances in designing orthopedic and craniofacial implants. Journal of biomedical materials research Part A, 101,11, 3349-3364. [6] Voinarovych, S., Kyslytsia, O., Masiuchok, O., Kuzmych-Ianchuk, I., Kaliuzhnyi, S., Polovetskyi, Y., Petkov, V., Drenchev, L., Valov, R., Dyakova, V. and Teodossiev, D., 2019. Biocompatible composite coating of titanium glass carbon. Series on Biomechanics, 33, 4, 40-46. [7] Elias, C.N., Lima, J.H.C., Valiev, R. and Meyers, M.A., 2008. Biomedical applications of titanium and its alloys. Jom, 60, 46-49. [8] Guo, L., Naghavi, S.A., Wang, Z., Varma, S.N., Han, Z., Yao, Z., Wang, L., Wang, L. and Liu, C., 2022. On the design evolution of hip implants: A review. Materials & Design, 216, 110552. [9] Colic, K., Sedmak, A., Grbovic, A., Tatic, U., Sedmak, S. and Djordjevic, B., 2016. Finite element modeling of hip implant static loading. Procedia Engineering, 149, 257-262. [10] Chethan, K.N., Zuber, M. and Shenoy, S., 2019. Finite element analysis of different hip implant designs along with femur under static loading conditions. Journal of Biomedical Physics & Engineering, 9, 5, 507. [11] Jiang, H.B., 2007. Static and dynamic mechanics analysis on artificial hip joints with different interface designs by the finite element method. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 4, 2, 123-131. [12] Senalp, A.Z., Kayabasi, O. and Kurtaran, H., 2007. Static, dynamic and fatigue behavior of newly designed stem shapes for hip prosthesis using finite element analysis. Materials & design, 28, 5, 1577-1583. [13] Van Thoan, P., Wen, G., Yin, H., Ld, H. and Sy Nguyen, V., 2015. Optimization design for spur gear with stress-relieving holes. International Journal of Computational Methods, 12, 02, 1550006. [14] Sabatini, A.L. and Goswami, T., 2008. Hip implants VII: Finite element analysis and optimization of cross-sections. Materials & Design, 29, 7, 1438-1446. [15] Prabowo, A.R., Sohn, J.M. and Triyono, J., 2020. Finite element analysis of different artificial hip stem designs based on fenestration under static loading. Procedia Structural Integrity, 27, 101-108. [16] Ebeling, C. and Raiser, L., 2019. Sensitivity-Analysis in biomechanical modelling and its relevance for total hip arthroplasty an application oriented analysis. Series on Biomechanics. [17] Beltagi, A., Guitteny, S., Amirouche, F., Imran, I., Elhafez, S. and Mohamed, G., 2021. Noninvasive prediction of compressive strength and fracture of thoracolumbar vertebrae: finite element analysis. Series on Biomechanics. [18] Bergmann, G., Bender, A., Dymke, J., Duda, G. and Damm, P., 2016. Standardized loads acting in hip implants. PloS one, 11, 5, p.e 0155612.
|
|
| Date published: 2024-11-15
(Price of one pdf file: 39.00 BGN/20.00 EUR)